I found this week’s topic of discussion interesting,
but I just cannot decide how exactly I feel about it. Using the first of the
Ruth West questions, “If life a valid expressive medium,?” I feel like in some
instances, in more than not, it is not valid to use life as an expressive form.
Using live animals, like a mouse, to experiment on just for the sake of art
seems a little morbid, and even so in most scientific research as well. For example,
the mouse that was genetically modified to have a human ear growing out of its
back does not seem to be morally right. The work shown in the lecture video by
Zaretsky is really not appealing, as most art is, at least to me. I do not
think that there should be limits on creativity per say, but when it comes to
what is moral or not, I believe that should be considered. When it comes to
manipulating organisms, primarily humans and animals, there should be different
standards and restrictions that artists and scientists have. Living organisms should
not be manipulated for the sake of art, if it causes and harm, especially pain,
unless the artist is inflicting it upon themselves, (like the case of the man
who put and ear on his arm).
On
the other hand, Natalie Jeremijenko, uses plants as her form of experimentation
on life forms. Her experiment “One Tree,”
uses cloned walnut trees that are planted in pairs in different areas of San
Fransisco to see how they react to their environment. This form of life manipulation
poses to be morally okay in my opinion; plant life can already be considered art
(i.e. landscape design).
Jeremijenko
also used plants to transform fire hydrant areas, creating street are with
plant life. There are other types of plant modification like genetically modified
seeds, as well as weeds that have gotten just out of control because of the
environmental effects on the modified plant life.
Bibliography/References
Jeremijenko,
Natalie. "The Art of the Eco-mindshift." Natalie Jeremijenko:,
Oct. 2009. Web. 07 May 2016. <http://www.ted.com/talks/natalie_jeremijenko_the_art_of_the_eco_mindshift>.
"Natalie
Jeremijenko." Natalie Jeremijenko. Web. 07 May 2016.
<http://www.inspirationgreen.com/natalie-jeremijenko.html>.
Stutz,
Bruce. "Wanted: GM Seeds for Study." Seed Magazine. 1 July
2010. Web. 07 May 2016.
<http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/wanted_gm_seeds_for_study/>.
Vesna,
Victoria. “Unit 6 View”. UC Online. Web.
07 May 2016. <https://cole2.uconline.edu/courses/484297/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=8599405>.
Yeates,
Ed. "'Super Weed' Taking Strong Hold in Utah." KSL.com. 08
June 2009. Web. 07 May 2016. <http://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=6754314>.
Photos
"Natalie
Jeremijenko's Assorted Prescriptions, including OneTrees." PopTech.
N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2016.
<http://poptech.org/blog/natalie_jeremijenkos_assorted_prescriptions_including_onetrees>
"Natalie Jeremijenko || Wave Hill - New York Public Garden and Cultural
Center." Wave Hill Blog. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2016.
<https://www.wavehill.org/arts/artists/natalie-jeremijenko/>.
Sardar,
Zahid, and Lea Suzuki. "Society's Signposts / Natalie Jeremijenko's Trees
Aren't Simply Decorative -- They Can Be Read like a Social Register." SFGate.
N.p., 23 Oct. 2004. Web. 08 May 2016.